Speaker summary
⁠58%5 analyzed articles/videos263 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FEMA results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.7% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 577.238 faulty-reasoning hits from 263 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,229 of 28,364 speakers). This FEMA is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
FEMA
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510028.7% percentile
18.2% BS Score5 analyzed videos263 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 15.3%15.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 37.7%37.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 6.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos