Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Feltman results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Bandwagon, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 250 faulty-reasoning hits from 129 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,191 of 27,733 speakers). This Feltman is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Feltman
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 129
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510030.8% percentile
19.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos129 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.7%21.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 21.7%21.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.0%24.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.7%14.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.0%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos