Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video46.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal incident managers results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 70 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (8,816 of 28,364 speakers). This Federal incident managers is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Federal incident managers
Speaker details
Total words: 46.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos