Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Harms Tracker results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Nature as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 180 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,422 of 28,364 speakers). This Federal Harms Tracker is worse (more manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group.
Federal Harms Tracker
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠95%Federal Harms Tracker (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510095.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos