Speaker summary
29% 1 analyzed article/video 1,035.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fawzia Amin Sido results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 280 hits . Analysis detected 1,100.846 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,035.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,926 of 28,364 speakers). This Fawzia Amin Sido is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Fawzia Amin Sido
Speaker details
Total words: 1,035.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 17.3% 17.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst