Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farah Momin results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Loss Aversion, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.3% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 91 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,050 of 28,364 speakers). This Farah Momin is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Farah Momin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
39.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 60.3%60.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 39.7%39.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.2%17.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 60.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos