Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video9 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Faith results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 9 hits. Analysis detected 45 faulty-reasoning hits from 9 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,394 of 28,364 speakers). This Faith is worse (more manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group.
Faith
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 9
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510095.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos9 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos