Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video59.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ezekiel Teaque results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and Overconfidence Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 160 faulty-reasoning hits from 59.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 83.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (6,349 of 37,767 speakers). This Ezekiel Teaque is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Ezekiel Teaque
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠84%Ezekiel Teaque (selected)84%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 59.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510083.2% percentile
83.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos59.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos