Speaker summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos134.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan Greer results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 382.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 134.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 24.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,122 of 28,364 speakers). This Evan Greer is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Evan Greer
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 134.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.6% percentile
24.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos134.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 36.9%36.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 36.9%36.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.5%18.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 36.9%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 36.9%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos