Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eva Moskowitz results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 43.875 hits. Analysis detected 243.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,239 of 28,364 speakers). This Eva Moskowitz is worse (more manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Eva Moskowitz
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.5% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos