Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video82 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eugene Carroll results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 73.2% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 239 faulty-reasoning hits from 82 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 32.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (13,356 of 26,730 speakers). This Eugene Carroll is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Eugene Carroll
Speaker details
Total words: 82
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
32.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos82 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 73.2%73.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 57.3%57.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 59.8%59.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 29.3%29.3%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.4%13.4%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.4%13.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 73.2%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 59.8%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 57.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 9.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 0.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 1.1%No True Scotsman: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos