Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video316.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Stratte results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.2% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 920.862 faulty-reasoning hits from 316.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (23,834 of 28,364 speakers). This Erin Stratte is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Erin Stratte
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 316.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510016.0% percentile
12.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos316.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.2%25.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos