Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video77 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Ford results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 51.9% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 77 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,527 of 28,364 speakers). This Erin Ford is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Erin Ford
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 77
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
41.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos77 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 52.0%52.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 52.0%52.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.8%20.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 52.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 52.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos