Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video185.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erick Athos results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Recency Bias, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 142.31 faulty-reasoning hits from 185.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,395 of 28,364 speakers). This Erick Athos is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Erick Athos
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 185.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510010.5% percentile
9.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos185.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.0%10.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos