Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video49.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erica Pan results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Primacy Effect, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 128 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,487 of 28,364 speakers). This Erica Pan is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Erica Pan
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 49.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.9% percentile
31.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 4.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos