Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Wessan results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 269 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,369 of 27,715 speakers). This Eric Wessan is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Eric Wessan
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
25.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos111 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 52.6%52.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 52.6%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos