Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video38.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Ruchensky results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43.5 hits. Analysis detected 101.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,161 of 28,364 speakers). This Eric Ruchensky is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Eric Ruchensky
Speaker details
Total words: 38.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510078.3% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos38.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos