Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Equal Justice Initiative results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Primacy Effect, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 192 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,354 of 28,364 speakers). This Equal Justice Initiative is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Equal Justice Initiative
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510095.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos