Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video58.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Data & Governance Initiative results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 88 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,060 of 26,018 speakers). This Environmental Data & Governance Initiative is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Environmental Data & Governance Initiative

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.6% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos58.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos