Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video112.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Moore results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 63.2% saturation with 71.103 hits. Analysis detected 113.103 faulty-reasoning hits from 112.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 43.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (10,431 of 26,064 speakers). This Emily Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Emily Moore
Speaker details
Total words: 112.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
43.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos112.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 63.2%63.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.6%23.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 63.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos