Speaker summary
66% 1 analyzed article/video 252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Leeming results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Nature , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 48 hits . Analysis detected 325.711 faulty-reasoning hits from 252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 6% (25,506 of 26,891 speakers). This Emily Leeming is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group. Emily Leeming
Speaker details
Total words: 252
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.2% percentile 6.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos252 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.7% 17.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.4% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Middle Ground: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.1% Red Herring: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.7% Composition/Division: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst