Speaker summary
⁠38%2 analyzed articles/videos232.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Clarke results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 255.228 faulty-reasoning hits from 232.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (24,692 of 28,364 speakers). This Emily Clarke is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Emily Clarke
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 232.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510012.9% percentile
10.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos232.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.0%8.0%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.0%18.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%No True Scotsman: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos