Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video232.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Bell McCormick results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 658.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 232.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,740 of 28,364 speakers). This Emily Bell McCormick is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Emily Bell McCormick
Speaker details
Total words: 232.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510019.8% percentile
13.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos232.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.8%26.8%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 16.4%16.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 19.2%19.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.4%12.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 0.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%No True Scotsman: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos