Speaker summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video83.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Alcala results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 208 faulty-reasoning hits from 83.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,955 of 28,364 speakers). This Emily Alcala is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Emily Alcala
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 83.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.2% percentile
20.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos83.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos