Speaker summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos213.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emilio Berti results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Straw Man, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 68.25 hits. Analysis detected 306.507 faulty-reasoning hits from 213.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,802 of 28,364 speakers). This Emilio Berti is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Emilio Berti
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 213.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.1% percentile
15.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos213.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.5%29.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 12.4%12.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos