Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video23 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emilie Abrahamson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 58.6% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 70 faulty-reasoning hits from 23 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 48.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,358 of 28,364 speakers). This Emilie Abrahamson is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Emilie Abrahamson
Speaker details
Total words: 23
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.5% percentile
48.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos23 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 58.6%58.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 41.4%41.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 58.6%58.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.4%41.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 41.4%41.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 58.6%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 58.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos