Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emilee Miklas results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,318 of 28,364 speakers). This Emilee Miklas is worse (more manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group.
Emilee Miklas
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 32
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510095.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos32 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos