Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emanuel Cleaver results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 55 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (15,653 of 26,836 speakers). This Emanuel Cleaver is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Emanuel Cleaver
Speaker details
Total words: 53
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
25.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos53 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos