Speaker summary
⁠29%2 analyzed articles/videos93.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emanuel "Chris" Welch results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 40 faulty-reasoning hits from 93.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,307 of 28,364 speakers). This Emanuel "Chris" Welch is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Emanuel "Chris" Welch
Speaker details
Total words: 93.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.9% percentile
16.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos93.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.6%10.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%In-Group Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos