Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video18.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elon Green results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 15.75 hits. Analysis detected 43.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 18.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,237 of 28,364 speakers). This Elon Green is worse (more manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Elon Green
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 18.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.5% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos18.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Negativity Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos