Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Wehrle results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Loss Aversion, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 54% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 336.777 faulty-reasoning hits from 141 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,930 of 28,364 speakers). This Elizabeth Wehrle is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Wehrle
Speaker details
Total words: 141
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
20.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos141 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 54.0%54.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 23.4%23.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 54.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos