Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video85 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 61.2% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 378 faulty-reasoning hits from 85 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,589 of 28,364 speakers). This Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)
Speaker details
Total words: 85
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.2% percentile
55.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos85 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 61.2%61.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 61.2%61.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 61.2%61.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 61.2%61.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 61.2%61.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 61.2%61.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 38.8%38.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 38.8%38.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 61.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 61.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 61.2%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 61.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 61.2%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 61.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 6.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos