Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video203 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Keever results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 369.454 faulty-reasoning hits from 203 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,757 of 28,364 speakers). This Elizabeth Keever is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Keever
Speaker details
Total words: 203
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.3% percentile
19.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos203 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 36.3%36.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.5%20.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Slippery Slope: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos