Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Goitein results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Genetic Fallacy, and Framing Effect, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 659.683 faulty-reasoning hits from 237 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (24,831 of 28,364 speakers). This Elizabeth Goitein is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Goitein
Speaker details
Total words: 237
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510012.5% percentile
10.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos237 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 10.5%10.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos