Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elise Bennett results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Bandwagon, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 84.3% saturation with 55.667 hits. Analysis detected 242.167 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 61.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,913 of 28,364 speakers). This Elise Bennett is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Elise Bennett
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠76%Elise Bennett (selected)62%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
61.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 84.3%84.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 76.5%76.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 53.0%53.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 53.0%53.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 47.0%47.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 53.0%53.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Negativity Bias: Speaker 84.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 76.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 53.0%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 53.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 53.0%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 47.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos