Speaker summary
⁠69%2 analyzed articles/videos112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elisabeth Alley-Bennett results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 69.9% saturation with 88.125 hits. Analysis detected 191.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 112 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,659 of 28,364 speakers). This Elisabeth Alley-Bennett is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Elisabeth Alley-Bennett
Speaker details
Total words: 112
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
23.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos112 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 69.9%69.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.2%20.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 69.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos