Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elias Picazo results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (8,764 of 28,364 speakers). This Elias Picazo is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
Elias Picazo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510069.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos