Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eli Valentin results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Primacy Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 55.9% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 209 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,239 of 28,364 speakers). This Eli Valentin is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Eli Valentin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.9% percentile
38.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 55.9%55.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 55.9%55.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 55.9%55.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 23.5%23.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 23.5%23.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.5%23.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 9.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos