Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eli Clifton results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 657 faulty-reasoning hits from 146 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 64.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,509 of 28,364 speakers). This Eli Clifton is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Eli Clifton
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 146
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
64.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos146 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos