Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video89.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eileen Connor results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 59.7% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 153 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,516 of 28,364 speakers). This Eileen Connor is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Eileen Connor
Speaker details
Total words: 89.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
21.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos89.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 59.7%59.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.4%13.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 59.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos