Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video73.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edward Zuniga results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 33.75 hits. Analysis detected 113.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (14,699 of 26,837 speakers). This Edward Zuniga is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Edward Zuniga
Speaker details
Total words: 73.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.2% percentile
28.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.9%40.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 22.7%22.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 22.7%22.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.9%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos