Speaker summary
52%1 analyzed article/video293.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edward Ricemeyer results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 516.518 faulty-reasoning hits from 293.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (24,968 of 28,364 speakers). This Edward Ricemeyer is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Edward Ricemeyer
Speaker details
Total words: 293.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.0% percentile
10.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos293.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 7.3%7.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos