Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video130.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edie Falco results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Straw Man, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 64.3% saturation with 94.5 hits. Analysis detected 304.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 130.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,292 of 28,364 speakers). This Edie Falco is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Edie Falco
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 130.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.1% percentile
34.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos130.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 64.3%64.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 42.9%42.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 42.9%42.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 21.4%21.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.4%21.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 64.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 42.9%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Speaker 42.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos