Speaker summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ed Robertson results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 27.657 hits. Analysis detected 201.657 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (15,018 of 28,364 speakers). This Ed Robertson is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
Ed Robertson
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510047.1% percentile
29.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 57.1%57.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 41.9%41.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 26.7%26.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.0%20.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 57.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 41.9%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos