Speaker summary
⁠70%2 analyzed articles/videos89.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ed Mead results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 217 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (8,416 of 37,766 speakers). This Ed Mead is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Ed Mead
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠78%Ed Mead (selected)63%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 89.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.7% percentile
62.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos89.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos