Speaker summary
96%1 analyzed article/video15 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dustin Johnson results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 15 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,212 of 26,848 speakers). This Dustin Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Dustin Johnson
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos15 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often