Speaker summary
⁠42%2 analyzed articles/videos88.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Enforcement Administration results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 54.4% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 141 faulty-reasoning hits from 88.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 45.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,776 of 28,364 speakers). This Drug Enforcement Administration is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Drug Enforcement Administration
Speaker details
Total words: 88.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510062.0% percentile
45.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos88.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 54.4%54.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.6%45.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 45.6%45.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 54.4%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 45.6%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos