Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drew Buckley results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 71.1% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 229.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,826 of 28,364 speakers). This Drew Buckley is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Drew Buckley
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
45.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 79.0%79.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 71.0%71.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 57.9%57.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 43.4%43.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 21.1%21.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 79.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 71.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 57.9%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos