Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Regina Chinsio-Kwong results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 62.7% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 175 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 49% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,247 of 28,364 speakers). This Dr. Regina Chinsio-Kwong is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Dr. Regina Chinsio-Kwong
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
49.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 62.8%62.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 54.9%54.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 41.2%41.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 54.9%54.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 41.2%41.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 54.9%54.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 62.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos