Speaker summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video137.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr Michael Lambert results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Confirmation Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 52.9% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 342 faulty-reasoning hits from 137.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,894 of 28,364 speakers). This Dr Michael Lambert is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Dr Michael Lambert
Speaker details
Total words: 137.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.4% percentile
20.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos137.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 52.9%52.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 36.9%36.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 52.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 36.9%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos